![]() One of the things I found interesting in this section was the introduction of satire. #Hidden colors full of falsehoods how toThey give the reader tips on how to balance out the amount of time you focus on what “they say” with how much of your own message is coming through. Mx.In this section of “They Say, I Say” by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein, they focus on the idea of summarization. It's so surprising, I had to read it twice – very "hooky". Either hook could be used, but my preference is ALT1. Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. ![]() Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation #Hidden colors full of falsehoods freeFree of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Y.Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems General: Article is new enough and long enough Improved to Good Article status by Gerald Waldo Luis ( talk). Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hrant Dink Foundation.that Plandemic was criticized for its professional-style production? Source: that BuzzFeed News compared the conspiracy film Plandemic: Indoctornation (logo pictured) with Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom and Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker ? Source: WikiProject Film / American / Documentary This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. Skepticism Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism Template:WikiProject Skepticism Skepticism articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Nevertheless, Plandemic being misinformation is a fact, not an opinion. In the end, it's up to the viewers to decide what they think of a topic, even Plandemic. Several conspiratorial reviews of the film are shown, and not once do either sides get justified here: this is an encyclopedia, and Wikipedia only reports what sources say, not trying to give superiority over a party. Q: Why does this article not state any praises regarding Plandemic and only talk about the bad stuff? A: Actually, this article does, as an attempt to present a wide view on the subject. Many of the claims stated within it, as well as Indoctornation, have been discovered to be untrue, and is reasonably backed up. According to reliable sources, most of which had extra fact-checking, Plandemic is misinformation due to its baseless claims regarding COVID-19 and virology, as well as several other topics including politics and Judy Mikovits. Q: Why is Plandemic deemed misinformation on Wikipedia? A: Wikipedia is a summary of information shared by reliable sources. As documentaries don't have to be of real information, it is safe to describe Indoctornation as a film. However, Plandemic: Indoctornation is an interview combined with original clips, one that can be seen in various documentaries. The first video is merely a 26-minute interview with several fair use clips, hence there is not much originality, and a video is a sufficient description. Q: Should Plandemic be called a video or a film? A: The consensus is that the first Plandemic is a video, whilst the second Plandemic is a film. ![]() According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions ( color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. that Plandemic was criticized for its professional-style production?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |